3.
a. From line 260-281 the last couple lines of anyone’s speech rhymes (e.g.,
b. Line 257 “Is queen of us, of ours, and our fair France.” I love this line. Watkins talked about how the Greeks used a semantic doubling effect (rhetorical pairs whether with synonyms or antonyms). Shakespeare does it here as a semantic tripling effect with us, ours, and our. It’s such a powerful use of inclusive words right after Cordelia’s father was so exclusive about her belonging to him any longer.
c. Line 87-90. The word echo or repetition of nothing is so ironic. She say “nothing” but in the end gets everything.
d. Cordelia’s speech of love (Line 95-103) has balanced phrases: “begot me, bred me, lov’d me” and “obey you, love you, and most honor you.”
e. IE theme: hero slays the dragon. The king says to Kent, “Come not between the dragon and his wrath.” Cordelia’s love conquers the dragon’s [her father’s] wrath in the end. It appears at the beginning that she has lost her father’s love and her inheritance because of the “dragon’s wrath”, but with love she conquers all.
f. I have more that I will mention in class.
Looks like point #1 got cut off in the posting? You have such a good eye for detail, as well as original insights and connections. Why are the characters trying to quantify love (point #2)? The balance of rhymed couplets at a crisis or climax is formulaic in Shakespeare's works (point #3a); I'm glad you noticed the rhymes. Language doublets and triplets are iconic in Lear because of the tensions between pairs and triads of characters, like the three daughters and the two wicked sisters (point #3b). What do mean in point 3c, that "She" says "nothing" but gets everything? What does she get? France? Glad you see the dragon-slayer theme.
ReplyDelete